Skip to main content

13.05a PD Interplay of social roles and status hierarchies in work teams

| Projects

Aim of the project

The aim of this research is to understand under what circumstances specific role structures emerge, how status hierarchies and role pattern co-evolve in groups, and how they affect the group outcome.

Theoretical background

In groups, people often fulfill informal roles corresponding to various tasks that emerge naturally from their interactions (Vedres and Stark, 2010; Wittek, 2001; Zingg et al., 2023). For example, the innovator proposes new ideas, whereas the facilitator ensures that resources are managed efficiently. The outcome of a group depends on the kinds of roles within the group (Magee and Galinsky, 2008). We need to understand under what circumstances specific role structures form and enhance group outcomes. Research has shown that roles develop in tandem with status hierarchies (Gruenfeld and Tiedens, 2010), which rank group members based on characteristics like age, job seniority, or task competence (Ridgeway,1991). Such hierarchies can lead to inequalities, disadvantaging low-status members by limiting their authority, access to resources, and privileges (Ridgeway and Markus, 2022; Accominotti, Lynn and Sauder,2022). This imbalance of control can erode trust and cohesion within the group, negatively impacting individual contributions to the group and overall outcomes (Dijk and Wilke, 1994; Eckel, Fatas and Wilson, 2010; Mackay et al., 2021). Sociological theories explain this dysfunctional group state (Blau, 1964; Thye,2000), yet some evidence suggests that people avoid it by taking on specific roles independent of status (Vedres and Stark, 2010; Arazy et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2019). We lack an explanation of how the co-evolution of role distributions and status hierarchies affect group outcomes.

Experiments show that behavior is influenced not only by dyadic status relations (Blau, 1964; Thye, 2000) but also by cognitive mechanisms, such as beliefs about the entire status hierarchy, particularly regarding the significance of competition within that hierarchy (Andrews-Fearon and Davidai, 2023). However, cognitive mechanisms have mainly been studied on isolated individuals, not on interactions between individuals from which roles emerge. By identifying the status- and cognition-dependent conditions for certain role structures, we can examine how they contribute to group outcomes. In this project, we examine the emergence of roles from interactions shaped by status relations and theorizedcognitive mechanisms and explore their impact on group outcomes. This project addresses the lack of contemporary role theory in sociology and examines novel ways to address major societal issues such as inequality.

Research design

The project investigates the joint impact of status hierarchies and roles on group outcomes utilizing longitudinal data from teams of software developers. The data are collected in a field study and a behavioral experiment. They include surveys on perceived status relations and roles within the group as well as coediting patterns of source code extracted from software repositories like GitHub. Network analysis is used to operationalize role structures. The field study examines existing teams of software developers from industry and the open-source community to define relevant roles and link them to status hierarchies. We will build theory to suggest a cognitive mechanism that explains how status influences the formation of roles and test it in a behavioral experiment on collaborative computer science students.

Funding

The project is funded partially by SCOOP and by the Swiss National Science Foundation through a Postdoc Mobility fellowship awarded to Ramona Roller.


  • Discipline
    Sociology
  • Location
    University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Sociology
  • Period
    May 1, 2024 - Present

Literature

Accominotti, Fabien, Freda Lynn and Michael Sauder. 2022. “The Architecture of Status Hierarchies: Variations in Structure and Why They Matter for Inequality.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(6):87–102.

Andrews-Fearon, Patricia and Shai Davidai. 2023. “Is status a zero-sum game? Zero-sum beliefs increase people’s preference for dominance but not prestige.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 152(2):389–409.

Arazy, Ofer, Johannes Daxenberger, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, Oded Nov and Iryna Gurevych. 2016. “Turbulent Stability of Emergent Roles: The Dualistic Nature of Self-Organizing Knowledge Coproduction.” Information Systems Research27(4):792–812.

Blau, Peter Michael. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Routledge.

Dijk, Eric Van and HenkWilke. 1994. “Asymmetry ofWealth and Public Good Provision.” Social Psychology Quarterly 57(4):352–359.

Eckel, Catherine C., Enrique Fatas and Rick Wilson. 2010. “Cooperation and Status in Organizations.”Journal of Public Economic Theory 12(4):737–762.

Gruenfeld, Deborah H and Larissa Z Tiedens. 2010. Organizational preferences and their consequences. In Handbook of social psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 1252–1287.

Mackay, Caroline M.L., Michael T. Schmitt, Annika E. Lutz and Jonathan Mendel. 2021. “Recent developments in the social identity approach to the psychology of climate change.” Current Opinion in Psychology 42:95–101.

Magee, Joe C. and Adam D. Galinsky. 2008. “8Social Hierarchy: The Self-Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status.” The Academy of Management Annals 2(1):351–398.

Ridgeway, Cecilia. 1991. “The Social Construction of Status Value: Gender and Other Nominal Characteristics.” Social Forces70(2):367–386.

Ridgeway, Cecilia L. and Hazel Rose Markus. 2022. “The Significance of Status: What It Is and How It Shapes Inequality.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7):1–25.

Thye, Shane R. 2000. “A Status Value Theory of Power in Exchange Relations.” American Sociological Review 65(3):407–432.

Vedres, Bal.zs and David Stark. 2010. “Structural Folds: Generative Disruption in Overlapping Groups.” American Journal of Sociology 115(4):1150–1190.

Wittek, Rafael. 2001. “Mimetic trust and intra-organizational network dynamics.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25(1):109–138.

Yang, Diyi, Robert E. Kraut, Tenbroeck Smith, Elijah Mayfield and Dan Jurafsky. 2019. Seekers, Providers, Welcomers, and Storytellers: Modeling Social Roles in Online Health Communities. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery pp. 1–14.

Zingg, Christian, Alexander von Gernler, Carsten Arzig, Frank Schweitzer and Christoph Gote. 2023. “Detecting and Optimising Team Interactions in Software Development.” p. 22. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14609